
The idea is above all to provide more opportunities for people in employment to acquire further training. Many employers are currently sceptical about funding an employee for an entire PhD programme or do not find it practically feasible to do so. Interest in taking licentiate degrees has also increased markedly in the past decade.
A study undertaken by the Swedish National Agency - Enrolment to postgraduate programmes aiming at licentiate degrees - shows, however, that some applicants are being enrolled in third-cycle programmes aiming at licentiate degrees even though they really want to take a PhD.
About 750 students are enrolled on licentiate programmes every year. Most of these are admitted to the Karolinska Institute and the Royal Institute of Technology.
Doctoral students with 'other funding' are often referred to as part-time doctoral students - and although this need not always be the case, it is common for these students to study part-time, that is to say at least fifty per cent.
Students with' other funding' may only be admitted if the faculty board or department considers their funding to be guaranteed for the entire programme and that the students in question can devote a sufficient amount of time to their studies to enable the completion of a Licentiate degree in four years or a PhD in eight. This has proved to be a difficult matter to determine in advance. (see also Funding).
Admission procedures
The Higher Education Ordinance (länk), which contains the regulations that apply to all higher education funded by the state, certain requirements must be fulfilled before a student may be admitted:
The number of doctoral students admitted to third-cycle courses and study programmes may not exceed the number that can be offered supervision and otherwise acceptable conditions for study and whose studies are funded pursuant to section 36. Section 34 of Chapter 7 of the Higher Education Ordinance Admission to third-cycle courses and study programmes.
The faculty board may only admit applicants to third-cycle courses and study programmes who have been appointed to doctoral studentships or awarded doctoral grants. The faculty board may, however, admit applicants who have some other form of funding for their studies if it considers that the funding can be guaranteed during the entire period of study and that the applicants can devote enough time to their studies to enable their completion within four years in the case of a licentiate degree or eight years in the case of a PhD. Section 36 of Chapter 7 of the Higher Education Ordinance Admission to third-cycle courses and study programmes.
The provisions that apply to third-cycle courses and study programmes lay down stringent requirements about the responsibility assumed by the higher education institutions for their students, supervision and funding.
This regulation was introduced to make sure that an institution's own students were not given preference. It is possible to waive this main regulation, for instance when a doctoral student is to undergo a programme within the framework of a post with an employer other than the specific higher education institution.
The faculty board determines on what basis the assessment is to be made in such cases. In practice this means that the applicants' previous attainment, for example their degree projects, etc. are evaluated.
If admission takes place on a given date during the term — and not sporadically as resources become available — it is easier to draw up this kind of academic ranking.
In its report The faculty boards' supervision of third cycle (doctoral) programmes from the perspective of legal rights (2008:5 R) summary in english, the Swedish National Agency emphasises that it is important for all those involved in admissions procedures to be familiar with the current regulations and that representatives of doctoral students and other students should be included in the bodies that deal with admissions. In other words the process of selection and admission should not in practice be left to the supervisors.
The board of governors of each higher education institution has to establish special admission procedures to be applied locally for such matters as applications, entry requirements and selection, as well as the method of deciding who is to be admitted. The procedures must be accessible to everyone.
In the National Agency's study Survey of doctoral students, 2008:23, doctoral students express a great deal of criticism of the prior information they receive about admission the programmes themselves.
Applications to third-cycle programmes are made directly to the department in question. There are often special forms for applying for a doctoral studentship and for admission to the programme itself. Ask the department secretary or someone with responsibility for third-cycle programmes. You are often required to include a funding plan for the duration of your studies with your application.
Students who embark on such a period in the hope of being admitted to a regular third-cycle programme are known as shadow doctoral students, or grey-zone doctoral students.
In its report The faculty boards' supervision of third cycle (doctoral) programmes from the perspective of legal rights (2008:5 R) summary in english, the Swedish National Agency asked the higher education institutions what needs could be seen and what advantages and disadvantages could be envisaged if a legal 'probationary' period for potential doctoral students was introduced. Analysis of the responses and the current legislation indicated that there were overwhelming arguments against such probationary periods. The Agency pointed out that everyone had more to gain from using the possibilities that exist of arranging admission procedures in which students' rights can be guaranteed and high standards maintained combined with effective, thorough and equitable monitoring of the performance of doctoral students.
According to the Higher Education Ordinance no period of 'shadow doctoral studies' may be required for enrolment. Certain institutions of higher education have tried to deal with the problem by introducing local rules forbidding this kind of arrangement.